Hey [livejournal.com profile] fearsclave!

Aug. 20th, 2003 09:52 pm
mousme: A view of a woman's legs from behind, wearing knee-high rainbow socks. The rest of the picture is black and white. (Muah!)
[personal profile] mousme
How many lawyers does it take to change a light bulb?

Such number as may be deemed necessary to perform the stated task in a timely and efficient manner within the strictures of the following agreement. Whereas the party of the first part, also known as 'the lawyers' and the party of the second part, also known as 'the light bulb' do hereby agree to a transaction wherein the party of the second part (light bulb) shall be removed from the current position as a result of failure to perform previously agreed upon duties, i.e. the lighting, elucidation, and otherwise illumination ofthe area ranging from the front (North) door, through the entryway, terminating at an area just through the primary living area, demarcated by the beginning of the carpet, any spillover illumination being at the option of the party of the second part (light bulb) and not required by the aforementioned agreement between the parties.

The aforementioned removal transaction shall include, but not be limited to, the following steps:

1. The party of the first part (lawyer) shall, with or without elevation at his option, by means of a chair, step stool, ladder or any other means of elevation, grasp the party of the second part (light bulb) and rotate the party of the second part (light bulb) in a counter clockwise direction, said direction being non-negotiable. Said grasping and rotation of the party of the second part (light bulb) shall be undertaken by the party of the first part (lawyer) to maintain the structural integrity of the party of the second part (light bulb), notwithstanding the aformentioned failure of the party of the second part (light bulb) to perform the customary and agreed upon duties. The foregoing notwithstanding, however, both parties stipulate that structural failure of the party of the second part (light bulb) may be incidental to the aforementioned failure to perform and in such case the party of the first part (lawyer) shall be held blameless for such structural failure insofar as the non-negotiable directional codicil (counter-clockwise) is observed by the party of the first part (lawyer) throughout.

2. Upon reaching a point where the party of the second part (light bulb) becomes seperated from the party of the third part ('receptacle'), the party of the first part shall have the option of disposing of the party of the second part (light bulb) in a manner consistent with all applicable state, local, and federal statutes.

3. Once seperation and disposal have been achieved, the party of the first part (lawyer) shall have the option of beginning the installation of the party of the fourth part ('new light bulb'). This installation shall occur in a manner consistent with the reverse procedures described in step one of this self same document, being careful to note that the rotation should occur in a clockwise direction, said direction also being non-negotiable and only until the party of the fourth part (new light bulb) becomes snug in the party of the third part (receptacle) and in fact becomes the party of the second part (light bulb).

Note: The above described steps may be performed, at the option of the party of the first part (lawyer), by said party of the first part (lawyer), or by his or her heirs and assigns, or by any and all persons authorized by him or her to do som the objective being to produce a level of illumination in the immediate vicinity of the aforementioned front (North) door consistent with maximisation of ingress and revenue for the party of the fifth part, also known as 'The Firm'.

Seen it.

Date: 2003-08-20 06:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fearsclave.livejournal.com
It's badly drafted; I could do far better ;).

Re: Seen it.

Date: 2003-08-20 07:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mousme.livejournal.com
*lol*

I'll bet it is, and I'll bet you could. It was probably written by a law student or something. :)

*continues on quest to find a lawyer joke [livejournal.com profile] fearsclave doesn't know*

On a completely unrelated note

Date: 2003-08-20 06:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] forthright.livejournal.com
Are you coming to Perseity tomorrow night?

Re: On a completely unrelated note

Date: 2003-08-20 06:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mousme.livejournal.com
Why yes, indeedy. Was going to post to that effect soonish. :)


Since I've got you here, I'll confirm it, and mention that Margot will be trying to check up on Faraz if she can to see how he's doing.

Research continues on Tyrel Lamarche and his mother to see what they're all about.

Hey, do you have any extra info on Stormfront that I, the player, could look at? I'm feeling a bit ignorant about the movement right now, and that annoys me. ;)

Erm, other than that... Margot would love to go out and see Vildis perform and otherwise get herself into fun parties with her, umm, friends. :)

Re: On a completely unrelated note

Date: 2003-08-20 07:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] curtana.livejournal.com
You going to have a little time to talk to your mother? ;)

Re: On a completely unrelated note

Date: 2003-08-20 07:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mousme.livejournal.com
Of course, Mommy. :)

Maybe we could do it in a separate window when it's not our turn to be harassed by or to harass the NPCs?

More screen time that way. :D

Re: On a completely unrelated note

Date: 2003-08-20 07:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] curtana.livejournal.com
Yes, that was the general idea :)

Date: 2003-08-20 07:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sadillac.livejournal.com
Oh har de har har, Alice.

Fears is right; it could be drafted better. ;^)

Indeed...

Date: 2003-08-20 07:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fearsclave.livejournal.com
Not so much as an indemnity clause, nothing about arbitration or choice of law, and no definitions section. I think this is going to take several more drafts before it's ready for prime time.

Re: Indeed...

Date: 2003-08-20 07:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sadillac.livejournal.com
Exactly.

Can you get a redlined copy to me by COB Friday? I'll review it over the weekend and let you know what my client thinks.

Profile

mousme: A view of a woman's legs from behind, wearing knee-high rainbow socks. The rest of the picture is black and white. (Default)
mousme

February 2026

S M T W T F S
1234567
8910 11121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 15th, 2026 04:05 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios