mousme: A view of a woman's legs from behind, wearing knee-high rainbow socks. The rest of the picture is black and white. (Bookshop)
[personal profile] mousme
I read Twilight last night, because I figured if I was going to openly mock the sparkly vampires, then I should at least do so with some knowledge of the material.

Yeah.

I'd promise to avoid spoilers in my review, but since there WAS NO PLOT EVER I don't think it's really necessary. Okay, onward.

1- The book won no points with me by being full of typos. Do the editors just not care?

2- The writing is okay. Nothing exceptional, but not terrible either, and the author has a good feel for sentence structure and rhythm. The tone is appropriate for a first-person teenage narrator (although a bit on the young side for a girl who's supposedly seventeen: I'd have pegged her at closer to thirteen or fourteen at most). I have nothing against the writing style for the most part, although it becomes very very purple (especially in the notorious "sparkling" scene) and kind of lurid and overblown at times. It's not egregious for the most part.

3- The narrator, protagonist Isabella "Bella" Swan, started getting on my nerves about a chapter and a half in. She's *thisclose* to being a Mary Sue, and is dull as dishwater otherwise. She describes her own appearance in what are meant to be disparaging terms, but the description is not-so-cunningly designed to make the reader understand that she is, in fact, quite pretty, if in a "non-standard" way. Too pale, dark hair, large eyes, blah blah blah.

Bella is gifted in English and writing, detests math (but appears to be good at it), is good at biology, but lest she be too "perfect" she's given an anime-esque flaw of being a hopeless clutz. Not just a bit clumsy, no: it's a HUGE production every time. She can't walk a straight line, continually injures herself or others during gym class, and can't manage an easy hike through the woods on a flat path without getting her jeans stained and torn and her hands scraped to hell.

The beginning of the book has her returning to her childhood hometown to live with her father during her last year of high school, in a deliberate choice of martyrdom so that she can make her mother happy (the mother is off gallivanting with her latest beau, Phil). It's made clear that Bella is extraordinarily mature for her age, an "old soul" who has always taken care of her mother rather than the other way around. She immediately takes over the maternal role with her father, Charlie, as well, even though he's lived for years on his own and can probably manage just fine.

From the moment she sets foot in school, Bella makes a big impression on the local boys, who proceed to fall all over themselves trying to ask her out, which only makes her uncomfortable. She's never ever had a boyfriend, you see, because she never found anyone who was Rightâ„¢.

Bella also spends a lot of time fainting and/or losing consciousness (fully or partly). More on her later, because Everything Is About Bella in this book.

4- Enter Vampires, stage right. Or possibly stage left. The Vampires don't move so much as they constantly appear seemingly out of nowhere. They are new-ish in town (have only been around for a couple of years) and thus are Strangers and Regarded With Suspicion by the small-town folk.

Blah blah blah spectacularly good-looking, intoxicating presence, mesmerizing gaze, loner types who don't mingle with other students, blah. Minorly interesting back stories, which I won't bother spoiling, for those of you who might want to read the book.

Edward is the Vampire Suitor. Not only is he incredible in every way (the way vampires are, don't you know), but he is a Soopar Extra Speshul Sparkly Vampire because he can hear people's thoughts. Oh yes. Not just a pretty face this one. This is where it gets to be All About Bella again, because she is so extra specially special that she is the one person whose thoughts he can't read, for some reason unknown to everyone except maybe the author, and I think her reason is that it makes Bella extra specially special and hasn't thought it through any more than that.

*puke*

Anyway, moving on.

5- Bella figures out that Edward is a vampire after having the information handed to her on a platter by a local Native American. He doesn't bother denying it ('cause she's so clever to have figured it out all by herself!), and decides to hell with all his clan's self-imposed rules and begins to date her. There's a lot of random reasons he gives for this decision, but it comes down to the fact that he finds her irresistible and they're Meant To Be and there's Fate involved, and blah blah blah.

Then there is LOTS OF ANGST for about two hundred pages. He can't be with her, she can't be with him, because it would be Dangerous and Wrong. They go out together anyway. There is more angst. She swoons a great deal. He is also a perfect gentleman, and RECOILS IN HORROR on the two occasions when she has the poor sense to try and add a little tongue to their kissing.

This is where the book really lost me. Edward spends an entire night in Bella's room, and NOTHING HAPPENS. They don't even kiss. Nothing. I'm sorry, but I don't buy it. It's so heavy-handed a message that it put me off. She's portrayed as a weak girl ruled by her sex drive and he's the strong man who knows The Right Way, and who guides her with a firm hand.

Add to this Cryptic Warnings from the local Friendly Natives Who Live On The Nearby Reservation (I can't make this shit up, I tell you!), sibling jealousy from the other teenage vampires, and parental worrying on both sides, and that sums up the first 70% of the novel.

6- I'm not kidding about that either. 70% of the novel is angst. No plot. I waited anxiously for a plot, any plot, to materialize. I was rewarded around page 370 of 498 pages.

Actual plot spoilers follow this

The conflict/plot is ridiculously simple. I have nothing against simple plots, but this feels as though the author made no effort whatsoever. It was insulting. Basically three bad vampires come onto the scene (unlike the "good vampires" in the book who don't feed off humans), and threaten Bella.

Blah blah blah they try to protect Bella, Bella is an idiot and tries to fix things on her own and gets her ass handed to her on a platter, and then Edward swoops in and saves her. After he saves her, he gives her a stern lecture along the lines of: "You see? You should have left things up to me the way I said. I still had to save you and now you're hurt."

Bella meekly accepts the verdict that she is a helpless maiden who should let herself be ruled by men, Edward takes her to the prom (no I'm not kidding, I SWEAR!), and we assume that they will live angstily ever after.

The end.

In short, I'm very glad that this was a quick and easy read. I lost patience with it very quickly, so if it had taken me any longer than a couple of hours to read I probably wouldn't have bothered finishing it.

Date: 2008-12-14 02:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elanya.livejournal.com
See, reading reviews like this is why I have really *not* had any desire to read the books!

Someone else on my f-list posted a good one a few months ago... lemme see if I can find it. Ahh, here we go. Starts with an investigations of comparisons of the author with JKR, moves in to story dissection later - she says a lot of the same things you did, but read the other books as well because her sister made her :x


Also a link to a hilarious interview with the guy who plays Edward in the movie, also from her.

Date: 2008-12-14 09:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mousme.livejournal.com
Hee hee hee!

I love it when he says he thinks the author is insane. It totally works!

Date: 2008-12-14 03:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] owldaughter.livejournal.com
if it had taken me any longer than a couple of hours to read I probably wouldn't have bothered finishing it.

Maybe that's why I finished it. Looking for the plot, or the reason why everyone was squeeful. It did only take an hour and a half.

Also, because it cost something like twelve dollars. I was determined to finish it if only to justify paying the money for it. (I have since joined the library.)

Tal asked me if it was any good and I had to honestly tell him that I couldn't remember what it was about in order to give him an opinion. Read it one night, had completely forgotten it by the next morning.

Date: 2008-12-14 03:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] owldaughter.livejournal.com
Ooh, check the lack of close-italics tag!

Date: 2008-12-14 09:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mousme.livejournal.com
That's why I wrote the review right away. I was convinced that I wouldn't remember it 24 hours later.

Date: 2008-12-14 05:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] talyesin.livejournal.com
I'm not sure I've forgiven you yet.

Twilight was SO BAD it made me want to quit writing. Because if THAT was what people wanted to read, I never want to be read.

Ugh. Ugh ugh ugh.

Date: 2008-12-14 09:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mousme.livejournal.com
It's pretty awful, yes.

Date: 2008-12-15 05:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] toughlovemuse.livejournal.com
Would you mind if I borrowed it then? I'd like to see what all the fuss is about.

Date: 2008-12-15 05:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] owldaughter.livejournal.com
Yup. I promised to lend it to you at your birthday thingy, I just haven't seen you since then.

"All the fuss" being the squeeing, or the bashing? ;)

Date: 2008-12-15 05:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] toughlovemuse.livejournal.com
Did I ask you then? I don't remember. Maybe it's just because I've already borrowed so many of your books (which you will see again. Not that you're probably worried.)

All the fuss meaning both the squeeing and the bashing. It seems a hot topic; I feel left out.

Date: 2008-12-15 05:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] owldaughter.livejournal.com
No, I'm not worried. Besides, I know where you live. ;)

Date: 2008-12-15 06:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] toughlovemuse.livejournal.com
I now have a flash video in my head wherein you show up, kick in my door, rush to my bookshelves and start filling a bag labelled "Lost book recovery".

Date: 2008-12-16 12:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mousme.livejournal.com
Possibly both. This book, apart from you, appears to have elicited pretty strong reactions both ways.

I agree with you, but since I had it fresh in my mind it was easy enough to write a review. I doubt I'll remember much in a month or so, when the outrage has worn off. ;)

Date: 2008-12-16 12:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] owldaughter.livejournal.com
Honestly? I don't have the energy to squee or bash. It left me so meh that whatever energy I could put into bashing or squeeing is much better invested elsewhere.

Yeah, I may finally be learning to pick my battles at the age of 37.

Date: 2008-12-14 03:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aislingtheach.livejournal.com
Peut-être un peu off-topic :/

Déjà l'affiche du film ne me disait rien de bon. Ça sentait la relation hétéronormative glamorifiée (pas juste hétérosexuelle, mais construite selon des normes de «moi/toi je/tu fais la fille et je/tu agis comme ça, pis moi/toi je/tu fais le gars qui je/tu agis comme ça»). Anyways, trop long pour expliquer, mais je crois que tu sais ce que je veux dire. Je ne me suis pas trop trompée, apparemment.

Ta lecture pénible m'a rappelé ton souhait de dresser une liste de 50 classiques à lire. Projet intéressant! :) J'aurais une suggestion, si tu veux. Un truc triste, avec les classiques-classiques, c'est que leur désignation comme classiques est également entachée d'un biais androcentrique et, euh, mm, «blanchocentrique» si tu me permets le néologisme maladroit. Ça pourrait donc être le fun de dresser une liste plus inclusive, qui permet du coup de s'enrichir de perspectives variées.

Je n'ai pas de telle liste à portée de la main, mais j'ai quelques suggestions:
Marguerite Yourcenar «Les Mémoires d'Hadrien»
Toni Morrison - le ou les ouvrages seraient à déterminer
James Baldwin - le ou les ouvrages à déterminer

Date: 2008-12-14 08:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thinkingoutlaw.livejournal.com
From what I can tell from my limited French, using my Spanish skills to decode, Aislingtheach is right about the "classics" being about dead white guys.
I would recommend Toni Morrison's The Bluest Eye
and James Baldwin's Almos' a Man

In that vein, I would add Julia Alvarez's In the Time of the Butterfly
Barbara Kingsolver's Poisonwood Bible.

Margaret Atwood: The Handmaiden's Tale

Wish I could have responded in French, but I can't.

Date: 2008-12-14 08:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thinkingoutlaw.livejournal.com
Anyone translate for me?

Date: 2008-12-14 08:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fearsclave.livejournal.com
You and [livejournal.com profile] aislingtheach really should meet one day.
Edited Date: 2008-12-14 08:27 pm (UTC)

Date: 2008-12-14 08:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thinkingoutlaw.livejournal.com
We'll be up that away again someday...if I have my way. :)

Date: 2008-12-14 08:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aislingtheach.livejournal.com
In that vein, I would add Julia Alvarez's In the Time of the Butterfly
Barbara Kingsolver's Poisonwood Bible.


I did not know these autors. Cool! :)

Margaret Atwood: The Handmaiden's Tale

Loved that one! I consider it a «must read»

Wish I could have responded in French, but I can't.

You did a great job picking up what my comment was about ;)

Date: 2008-12-15 02:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thinkingoutlaw.livejournal.com
Merci! (that's the extent of my French. Well, that an equerrelle, which I'm sure I spelled wrong. I collect the word for squirrel in other languages. I know it in French, Italian, Spanish, Arabic, Chinese, Ukranian, Russian, Czech, Romanian, German, Dutch, English and American Sign Language). Yeah, I'm weird, but I figure that words are easier to pack when I move and it's a nice ice breaker.

If you like Morrison's Beloved, you'll like Edgwidge Danticat's Breath, Eyes, Memory though it's a little freaky. I happen to love Isabel Allende, but her magical realism might push some over the edge.

Sorry, raging bibliophile.... probably need a support group.

Date: 2008-12-15 02:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mousme.livejournal.com
Sorry, raging bibliophile.... probably need a support group.

You, me, and probably most of our friends. :) Did I mention my father collects rare and antique books? I grew up in a house which had a room we called "the library." We had a separate living room. Yeah. "Bibliophile" doesn't begin to cover it.

I haven't yet read any Morrison or Allende, and in fact the whole magical realism crowd has never really ended up on my reading list.

I've read the Handmaid's Tale (and loved it!), the only Atwood I've ever read, for that matter.

Oh, and it's spelled "écureuil," if you were wondering. :)

Date: 2008-12-15 05:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aislingtheach.livejournal.com
Well, that an equerrelle, which I'm sure I spelled wrong

LOL, en effet ;) it's spelled «écureuil».

I guess you have a love for squirrels... and that I get a reward for figuring that out ;)

If you like Morrison's Beloved, you'll like Edgwidge Danticat's Breath, Eyes, Memory though it's a little freaky. I happen to love Isabel Allende, but her magical realism might push some over the edge.

Hm... er... I heard about Morrison, but I never read her. My book addiction is of the scholarly type. ;) But thanks for the suggestions! I might read a novel eventually ;)

Sorry, raging bibliophile.... probably need a support group.

No. no, everything is just fine... here... take this book. This is good stuff, I assure you :P


Date: 2008-12-15 08:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thinkingoutlaw.livejournal.com
Not particularly that I like squirrels... though they are tasty. It's that someone that I worked with started calling me "Veverika" which is squirrel in Czech. All the other folks from foreign parts started calling me their version of squirrel, and the habit just stuck. I now ask people with other languages the word for squirrel. It's weird. :)

Date: 2008-12-16 12:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] owldaughter.livejournal.com
That is so neat. :)

Date: 2008-12-14 09:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mousme.livejournal.com
Thanks! I was just saying that I am VERY open to non-dead-white-guys for my reading, so suggestions are welcome!

Toni Morrison was already on my list. :)

Date: 2008-12-15 04:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elanya.livejournal.com
Zora Neale Hurston!

Date: 2008-12-14 09:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mousme.livejournal.com
Merci!

Toni Morrison était déjà sur ma liste, mais je suis très ouverte à toutes les suggestions pour des livres, euh, "non-blancs," ou comme mon système policier le définit (qui nous fait grincer les dents à tous) "Autre Que Blanc." :P

Date: 2008-12-14 05:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fearsclave.livejournal.com
I... i got nuthin'.

Sparkly vampires? Feh.

Date: 2008-12-14 09:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mousme.livejournal.com
Yeah. I only have a rant because I read the book. Two words of advice: don't bother.

Date: 2008-12-15 01:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blackholecali.livejournal.com
Not just sparkly vampires: Sparkling vegetarian virgin vampires.

Date: 2008-12-15 02:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mousme.livejournal.com
It alliterates! :P

Date: 2008-12-14 08:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thinkingoutlaw.livejournal.com
You were kidding when you said the author had a good sense of sentence structure, right? It was the same basic three sentences over and over again. One of my students was reading it, so I started reading it out loud to her, showing her the repetitive cadence. Even she, who by all accounts, is not the brightest crayon in the box, could find the repetition in the sstructure. She ended the conversation with the fact that she reads it because the story is good... which leadsd us back to the box of crayon metaphor. Of course, when you're sixteen, a formula romance novel, albeit one sans sex, is generally right up your alley.
Blech. I know, I'm supposed to be happy they're reading...

Date: 2008-12-14 09:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mousme.livejournal.com
Well, I wasn't kidding, but the word "good" was perhaps a bit strong in my valiant attempt to find some redeeming value to the book.

I was unoffended by the sentence structure. I guess that's all. :P

Date: 2008-12-14 09:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cpirate.livejournal.com
Oh, don't worry, now there's a movie they can go see instead of having to read all those words! A classic Onion headline: "New Harry Potter movie teaches children the joys of not reading."

Date: 2008-12-14 11:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] laurensa.livejournal.com
Aaand this was the final straw in the camel's back to convince I will most definitely NOT be picking this book up. I had a sense I wouldn't like it anyway, but I thought maybe it was just me resisting the trendiness, as I am wont to do.

No plot and repetitive sentence structure? Nope. I'd have to fling the book at the wall half way through.

Date: 2008-12-15 02:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mousme.livejournal.com
Yeah, I really wouldn't bother. I resisted the trendiness with Harry Potter, and loved it when I finally read it, but this? This is drivel.

Date: 2008-12-14 11:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miseri.livejournal.com
Now you must write a vampire story to show the world how it *should* be done. Because I know you can do it.

Heck, *I* feel like writing something, after that review.

Date: 2008-12-15 02:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mousme.livejournal.com
I dunno. Vampires have been done over and over and over, and I'm not sure I have anything original to contribute to the genre at this point.

You've already written a good vampire book, though. What are you talking about?

Date: 2008-12-15 12:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] solitaryraven.livejournal.com
Agreed on just about every count of this. I'm incredibly happy to know that I'm not the only one incredibly bothered by all of the typos. I understand that editors miss things and that there are occasional typos. It happens. Not that much.

To be honest, I enjoyed the book the first time I read it. Since then, I've found about 10,000 reasons why I really don't feel that way anymore. And just a forewarning, Twilight is by far the best of the bunch. The writing is okay in Twilight, it gets to the point of abysmal by Breaking Dawn.

And you've hit on just about every reason why I want to pull my hair out every time someone compares this series to Harry Potter.

Date: 2008-12-15 02:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mousme.livejournal.com
Hey, a Ravenclaw! I have many of you on my flist. :)

Yeah, this series has nothing to do with Harry Potter. It's not original in its thinking, is rife with heavy-handed morality, and offers nothing new to the YA genre.

Date: 2008-12-15 03:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] solitaryraven.livejournal.com
Yep. Hmm...I don't know if I have too many on mine. It seems many of my friends are gryffindors. lol

Yeah. I can see how the media/fandom frenzy is comparable at the moment, but, honestly, I don't see the Twilight series having the staying power that HP does. HP appeals to people all over the world of all ages...Twilight, not so much. Not to mention that the storyline, characters, and themes are timeless, as opposed to Twilight. You said, the morality sort of hits you over the head and, personally, I've come to find Bella's "I'll throw my own mortality and my entire life away for this gorgeous, sparkly, dazzling guy" incredibly insulting.

Date: 2008-12-15 03:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] whiskeygirl8.livejournal.com
Between the reviews I've read and the many excerpts (thank you, fandom_wank), I know that I do not want to waste my time with this series. It frightens me.

Also, I just cannot accept sparkling vampires. I can accept beautiful vampires (I cut my teeth--so to speak--on Ann Rice's vampires, after all) but definitely not sparkly.

Also, on a more serious note, I believe that these books are warped. They have a message not only of compliance and submissiveness for women, but Edward becomes a bit emotionally abusive, controlling, and stalkerish and I don't think young girls need to be using this couple as a model of what their relationships should be like. And the way it all ends is just...fucked up. If I had a pre-teen or teen daughter, we would have some serious talks before I let her read these books.

Date: 2008-12-15 03:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sorceror.livejournal.com
I picked up the first in the Blood Ties series a while ago, and I'm in the middle / near the end.

It's better than this sounds, at least.

Date: 2008-12-15 08:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thinkingoutlaw.livejournal.com
I had an "aha" moment in the shower today. (Largely because that's when all good ideas come to me: when I have no access to pen or paper).

The teenage girls are into this book because it features a male characters who is actually quasi-male. Meaning? All the boys their age, and even men in general, are infantalized to the point where they can't fend for themselves. If you watch sitcomes at all, you are repeatedly bashed over the head with the concept of the "big, dumb husband." I hardly endorse relationships with uneven power structures, but I can see the allure that a boy/man who takes charge has for girls who are almost expected to bear the burden of responsibility in a relationship.

See this article for more about the "big, dumb husband." While I don't follow her particular religion, I think she eloquently comments on the idea.

http://www.thefamilyhomestead.com/bigdumbhusband.htm

Date: 2008-12-16 12:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mousme.livejournal.com
Yeah, I've noticed this as well about TV and books. Once in a while it's amusing, but it's a pretty insidious trope. For one, it consistently undermines women, weirdly enough. The message is: "See? You really do have to be everything to everyone, without whining or grumbling or expecting help or equal wages, because that's just How It Is. Men need you, so suck it up and deal." It's pandering and condescending, and bleah.

I'd love to see a few real relationships of equals, for once. That's why I love the neo-Victorian mysteries. Laurie R. King, Elizabeth Peters, Carole Nelson Douglas, etc. She has strong female heroines, but their male partners are always, always a match for them. They have arguments, each thinks the other one is useless but adorable, and they have very strong, complementary partnerships. I don't mean complementary in the sense that she's all female intuition and he's all logic, either: they are always well-matched in intellect, temperament, and often physically as well.

/end rant

Date: 2008-12-16 01:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] karine.livejournal.com
We discussed Twilight at Ceri's party and I said I'd dig up the comics and play-by-play a friend made about the series.

This is all in good fun: the coments that follow are sometimes full of fangirlish "OMG U ARESO HORRRIBEL 4 H8TING teh BOOK" that completely miss the point of parody.

Comics:
http://shinga.deviantart.com/art/Head-Trip-Twilight-Sucks-85504254
http://shinga.deviantart.com/art/Head-Trip-Breaking-Dawn-98016573

Blow-by-blow parody:
Twilight - chapter one starts here:
http://shinga.livejournal.com/478415.html
New Moon - chapter one starts here:
http://shinga.livejournal.com/579477.html

And someone made a YouTube adaptation of chapters 1 and 2 of Twilight:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_524SIimag
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TgohHuSxRO8

Profile

mousme: A view of a woman's legs from behind, wearing knee-high rainbow socks. The rest of the picture is black and white. (Default)
mousme

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 1920 21 222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 24th, 2026 02:58 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios