Ain't no Superman
May. 11th, 2007 10:25 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Even Mother Theresa limited herself to Calcutta, for the most part.
The human mind can't encompass more than about 100 close friends and family. Beyond that, it's physically incapable of caring just that much. This is a good thing, a survival mechanism. Can you imagine feeling the same devastating sorrow as losing a parent or a sibling or a child or your best childhood friend every time someone out there dies?
I would go insane. More insane than I am now. It would make life unbearable. We'd constantly be in emotional agony. Who wants to live like that?
I believe in the interconnectedness of beings. I don't believe one person inherently has more value than another. I also believe that some people have more value to me than others. I love my parents, but the teller at the bank will only get a civilized nod and a "Good morning" at best. The guy I pass on the street will never be acknowledged 99% of the time. My friends are more important to me than my coworkers.
Would I like to save the world? Sure. But I can't. I also can't care about the world in its entirety. I can care about my small corner of the world. I can strive to try and make my friends and family happy and safe, and to make my corner of the world a pleasant place for them to live.
My friends and family have friends and family of their own. My circle and their circle are not the same, and so I trust them to take care of those they love whom I don't know. In turn, those people must take care of their own. Eventually, there must be a trickle-down effect.
This isn't a perfect system. There's no such thing as a perfect system. It's just the best and only thing I know how to do. I am not a revolutionary, nor am I an activist. I lose myself in crowds, and I don't have the voice or the oratory skills for speeches. I am not brilliant. I will never write anything that will irrevocably change the way people think.
The best I can hope for is that someone someday will look at me and say: "You know, I think she's onto something. Maybe I'll try that too."
The human mind can't encompass more than about 100 close friends and family. Beyond that, it's physically incapable of caring just that much. This is a good thing, a survival mechanism. Can you imagine feeling the same devastating sorrow as losing a parent or a sibling or a child or your best childhood friend every time someone out there dies?
I would go insane. More insane than I am now. It would make life unbearable. We'd constantly be in emotional agony. Who wants to live like that?
I believe in the interconnectedness of beings. I don't believe one person inherently has more value than another. I also believe that some people have more value to me than others. I love my parents, but the teller at the bank will only get a civilized nod and a "Good morning" at best. The guy I pass on the street will never be acknowledged 99% of the time. My friends are more important to me than my coworkers.
Would I like to save the world? Sure. But I can't. I also can't care about the world in its entirety. I can care about my small corner of the world. I can strive to try and make my friends and family happy and safe, and to make my corner of the world a pleasant place for them to live.
My friends and family have friends and family of their own. My circle and their circle are not the same, and so I trust them to take care of those they love whom I don't know. In turn, those people must take care of their own. Eventually, there must be a trickle-down effect.
This isn't a perfect system. There's no such thing as a perfect system. It's just the best and only thing I know how to do. I am not a revolutionary, nor am I an activist. I lose myself in crowds, and I don't have the voice or the oratory skills for speeches. I am not brilliant. I will never write anything that will irrevocably change the way people think.
The best I can hope for is that someone someday will look at me and say: "You know, I think she's onto something. Maybe I'll try that too."
no subject
Date: 2007-05-12 05:46 am (UTC)Also, a certain amount of recoiling from the implications of a worst-case scenario might be involved.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-12 06:21 am (UTC)Living in a city, cooperating with all the citizens. The guy in
I'm wondering how people whose only skills are information based would make their way?
no subject
Date: 2007-05-12 06:33 am (UTC)They call that a favela in Latin America, and frankly, I'd like living in one even less. I'll stick to the sticks unless forced out of them, thank you very much.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-12 12:36 pm (UTC)This is why, for me, it's very important to build communities wherever I go. If I need a skill, I will need someone to teach it to me.
While there are so many conflicting theories about peak oil, I have no idea what the city will be like after that. I have a feeling it'll resemble the Depression era in more ways than one. While I don't especially want to be an urbanite under those circumstances, if I happen to be living in the city when it happens, well, I'll just suck it up and deal as best I can. No other way about it.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-13 03:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-12 12:27 pm (UTC)I do think there are many people out there who are violent and opportunistic, but they are not the majority.
I don't think the majority of people would hesitate to put their welfare above mine. From there to outright physical violence is a stretch. If you look at huge natural disasters, like the recent devastation of Hurricane Katrina, you'll note that the vast majority did *not* engage in violence. They were lost, disoriented, unable to do much other than fend for themselves and their close families, but there was relatively little violence involved for a disaster on that scale.
I do think you're being pessimistic about human nature on the whole. Sure, disaster brings out the worst in us, but it also brings out the best in us. :)
no subject
Date: 2007-05-12 12:35 pm (UTC)How about Sarajevo? That one's not a great example, because an organized "them" trying to kill "us" with modern military hardware also tends to foster a sense of community solidarity.
Mogadishu, perhaps? Baghdad?
I guess we're lucky, in that we don't have any examples of a modern Western city being thrown into complete anarchy,
no subject
Date: 2007-05-13 03:54 am (UTC)